kityboy impersonator aimbots
KittyBoy, Tue Feb 16 2010, 09:41PMHey just got this demo around 3:40 utc Feb 17/2010.
I was raged how he was borrowing my name without a t.
PS sorry the demo is teh heug!!!
oh and he just used the name "killmeplease." -- killmeplease look-a-like
]2010_2_16_21_40_20_kittyboy_ut4_superman_ctf.dm_68[/file]
Re: kityboy impersonator aimbots
|$|TheDamager, Tue Feb 16 2010, 09:48PM
i told you to put this in the superman hackers thread... *sigh*
I have a number of demos if anyone needs more proof, wont bother double posting on the other thread
|$|TheDamager, Tue Feb 16 2010, 09:48PM
i told you to put this in the superman hackers thread... *sigh*
I have a number of demos if anyone needs more proof, wont bother double posting on the other thread
Re: kityboy impersonator aimbots
|$|Son, Wed Feb 17 2010, 04:19AM
Killmeplease is haxin?
ill look into demo when i got home, but he always seemed ok to me
|$|Son, Wed Feb 17 2010, 04:19AM
Killmeplease is haxin?
ill look into demo when i got home, but he always seemed ok to me
Re: kityboy impersonator aimbots
|$|TheDamager, Wed Feb 17 2010, 04:57AM
different killmeplease, hes a name theif, changed name to kityboy when there was a kittyboy already on server, then changed name to killmeplease. while killmeplease (the regularish) was on.
Just a real asshat IMO
|$|TheDamager, Wed Feb 17 2010, 04:57AM
different killmeplease, hes a name theif, changed name to kityboy when there was a kittyboy already on server, then changed name to killmeplease. while killmeplease (the regularish) was on.
Just a real asshat IMO
Re: kityboy impersonator aimbots
|$|Son, Wed Feb 17 2010, 09:26AM
oh, ok i understand now. ;)
if he was smart enough he would remind that his IP is what gives to him "identity", and name stealing is another fire to him get burned.
|$|Son, Wed Feb 17 2010, 09:26AM
oh, ok i understand now. ;)
if he was smart enough he would remind that his IP is what gives to him "identity", and name stealing is another fire to him get burned.
Re: kityboy impersonator aimbots
Gladi8r, Wed Feb 17 2010, 10:15AM
You know, the more I think about it, the more I think that, in addition to a good anti-cheat (4.2, where are you?) we need a good PAID UrT software package. Register the serials. One serial per user. The programmers are clever enough to institute an effective activation/registration config. Most of the UrT fans would gladly pay $25 each for the game in order to avoid the asshattery.
Asshat-free UrT... imagine...
Gladi8r, Wed Feb 17 2010, 10:15AM
You know, the more I think about it, the more I think that, in addition to a good anti-cheat (4.2, where are you?) we need a good PAID UrT software package. Register the serials. One serial per user. The programmers are clever enough to institute an effective activation/registration config. Most of the UrT fans would gladly pay $25 each for the game in order to avoid the asshattery.
Asshat-free UrT... imagine...
Re: kityboy impersonator aimbots
|$|Son, Wed Feb 17 2010, 11:13AM
I´m talkin in my opinion of course, but i second what u stated Glad.
i will not cry if we need to pay something for URT, so that we can be asshat and hax free.
and i believe that many URT players aprove this opinion to.
we all love free games, programs, etc, but we are always surrounded by this sh....
|$|Son, Wed Feb 17 2010, 11:13AM
I´m talkin in my opinion of course, but i second what u stated Glad.
i will not cry if we need to pay something for URT, so that we can be asshat and hax free.
and i believe that many URT players aprove this opinion to.
we all love free games, programs, etc, but we are always surrounded by this sh....
Re: kityboy impersonator aimbots
FSK405|worm, Wed Feb 17 2010, 12:22PM
I think whilst you make a really valid point Glad, I have to disagree. I wouldn't have found UrT if it wasn't free. I was using Linux and looking for a decent fps game to get me away from playing America's Army and to fill the gap left by removing Halo from my life when I switched from Windows.
Swiftly, many of my friends started playing UrT and I think I can safely say none of them would have done so if there was a charge for the game.
Yes, the level of tomfoolery in UrT is higher perhaps than in some other games, but exclusivity locks people out. Openness encourages people in, and that includes people who could be a valuable asset to the game and the community.
FSK405|worm, Wed Feb 17 2010, 12:22PM
I think whilst you make a really valid point Glad, I have to disagree. I wouldn't have found UrT if it wasn't free. I was using Linux and looking for a decent fps game to get me away from playing America's Army and to fill the gap left by removing Halo from my life when I switched from Windows.
Swiftly, many of my friends started playing UrT and I think I can safely say none of them would have done so if there was a charge for the game.
Yes, the level of tomfoolery in UrT is higher perhaps than in some other games, but exclusivity locks people out. Openness encourages people in, and that includes people who could be a valuable asset to the game and the community.
Re: kityboy impersonator aimbots
|$|Son, Wed Feb 17 2010, 01:49PM
good point Rob, same happened to me, i started cause it was free to play.
But nowadays this game (URT) is well known by many people, its an "old" game, one of the best fps there is, but we have to agrre in one point:
hackers, and asses look for "free" games, without steam acounts, and URT is "heaven" to them, if it wasn´t the effort of the Admins to keep game clean, but all efforts aren´t always enough :(
The people who likes URT or even the new players wouldnt mind to pay something to keep it far from asses.
u have to agree that who wants to play COD, CS, BF without asses they have to buy the game, and theres a huge number of players enjoying the games.
just my thought, everyone has the right to have different opinions, but with payable URT the number of players would not decrease, and we will have the garantee that we will only have fair players
:D FOT
|$|Son, Wed Feb 17 2010, 01:49PM
good point Rob, same happened to me, i started cause it was free to play.
But nowadays this game (URT) is well known by many people, its an "old" game, one of the best fps there is, but we have to agrre in one point:
hackers, and asses look for "free" games, without steam acounts, and URT is "heaven" to them, if it wasn´t the effort of the Admins to keep game clean, but all efforts aren´t always enough :(
The people who likes URT or even the new players wouldnt mind to pay something to keep it far from asses.
u have to agree that who wants to play COD, CS, BF without asses they have to buy the game, and theres a huge number of players enjoying the games.
just my thought, everyone has the right to have different opinions, but with payable URT the number of players would not decrease, and we will have the garantee that we will only have fair players
:D FOT
Re: kityboy impersonator aimbots
Gladi8r, Wed Feb 17 2010, 01:59PM
This game wasn't always 'free', it used to be that you had to own Quake 3 to run the mod. Same with Quake 1 & 2, mods such as Team Fortress (Q1), etc. A lot less BS went on when it wasn't free.
I applaud 'open source' software and the developers who donate their time to create it, but our current issues underscore the one big flaw in a purely 'open source' model- that is, that efforts toward 'open-source' software security must be as thorough as the efforts toward creating and improving the software itself in the first place. Until this happens, Free software will be worth exactly what you paid for it.
Imagine one of the 'free' versions of Linux without an anti-virus running on it. That's what we have here- a 'gaming version of Linux' with no AV support. Imagine trying to use your computer and you have to stop at least twice a day to get rid of a virus. Hard to fathom, isn't it? Now imagine trying to game and being interrupted by cheaters and asshats twice a day. (that one's not hard to imagine at all)
OK- How about this?- Game is free, playing on 'unregistered' servers is free, and it costs $25 for an EFFECTIVE registration/anti-cheat/whatever system to play it on 'registered' servers.
PS- The game isn't really 'Free' per se, since folks like FSK405, many clans, UAA, generous players, volunteer mapmakers, etc etc, donate boatloads of time and cash to keep it afloat. The aggregate amount of money that goes to support UrT alone due to server fees, websites fees, bandwidth, hardware, software, etc has to exceed $50,000 USD a month. Very few players ever make a single donation to keep this stuff running, much less a 'regular' monthly donation. The ongoing ability to play this game isn't 'free', it's just that most people don't realize (or just don't appreciate) that there are a small minority of us willing to fork over cash on a regular basis to play it and to allow others to do so as well.
Gladi8r, Wed Feb 17 2010, 01:59PM
This game wasn't always 'free', it used to be that you had to own Quake 3 to run the mod. Same with Quake 1 & 2, mods such as Team Fortress (Q1), etc. A lot less BS went on when it wasn't free.
I applaud 'open source' software and the developers who donate their time to create it, but our current issues underscore the one big flaw in a purely 'open source' model- that is, that efforts toward 'open-source' software security must be as thorough as the efforts toward creating and improving the software itself in the first place. Until this happens, Free software will be worth exactly what you paid for it.
Imagine one of the 'free' versions of Linux without an anti-virus running on it. That's what we have here- a 'gaming version of Linux' with no AV support. Imagine trying to use your computer and you have to stop at least twice a day to get rid of a virus. Hard to fathom, isn't it? Now imagine trying to game and being interrupted by cheaters and asshats twice a day. (that one's not hard to imagine at all)
OK- How about this?- Game is free, playing on 'unregistered' servers is free, and it costs $25 for an EFFECTIVE registration/anti-cheat/whatever system to play it on 'registered' servers.
PS- The game isn't really 'Free' per se, since folks like FSK405, many clans, UAA, generous players, volunteer mapmakers, etc etc, donate boatloads of time and cash to keep it afloat. The aggregate amount of money that goes to support UrT alone due to server fees, websites fees, bandwidth, hardware, software, etc has to exceed $50,000 USD a month. Very few players ever make a single donation to keep this stuff running, much less a 'regular' monthly donation. The ongoing ability to play this game isn't 'free', it's just that most people don't realize (or just don't appreciate) that there are a small minority of us willing to fork over cash on a regular basis to play it and to allow others to do so as well.
Re: kityboy impersonator aimbots
mindriot, Wed Feb 17 2010, 02:11PM
I posted this in the superman hacker thread based on Boogie's demo. Same hacker that KittyBoy recorded.
Killmeplease.
Banned.
@69294
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
190.231.186.185
Reason: Aimbot
On the topic of charging for UrT, worm and Glad make good points. The restricted serial system existed under the Q3A engine back in the 3.7 and earlier days. If the dev team wanted to directly profit from it they would have had to license the Q3A engine and factor that into the cost.
With the release of the Q3A source code under the GPL license, the development of the ioQuake3 engine became a possibility. This engine has undergone many improvements which has allowed games like UrT and Tremulous to be standalone and entirely free (not relying on a copy of Q3A to run).
My understanding of the GPL license is that the dev team could change back to restricted serial system and charge for it. The drawbacks are:
- Since the serial system would be a part of ioUrbanTerror (ioQuake3 with modifications), it would have to be open-source code per the rules of the ioQuake3 (Q3A source code) GPL. Obviously, hackers could see how the system works and most likely compromise it.
- Negative publicity.
- A severe decline in players from which it be difficult to recover.
- Having to develop and maintain such a system, which I wonder if the dev team has the resources to support.
- As part of developing this system, the dev team would have to break from the development track of ioQuake3, which is a serious problem if one wants to use future ioQuake3 updates.
The hackers and asshats are a nuisance yet I fear a restricted system would hasten the demise of UrT. Although I was gone for the 3.7 days, my impression is that the UrT was in a serious decline and might not have survived without the release of 4.0 under ioQuake3. UrT is a great game but it is running on a heavily modified engine that was released 10 years ago.
I fear that 4.2 will be the last major update. Regardless, I applaud the dev team for their continual development and support, and I will enjoy the game while it lasts.
mindriot, Wed Feb 17 2010, 02:11PM
I posted this in the superman hacker thread based on Boogie's demo. Same hacker that KittyBoy recorded.
Killmeplease.
Banned.
@69294
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
190.231.186.185
Reason: Aimbot
On the topic of charging for UrT, worm and Glad make good points. The restricted serial system existed under the Q3A engine back in the 3.7 and earlier days. If the dev team wanted to directly profit from it they would have had to license the Q3A engine and factor that into the cost.
With the release of the Q3A source code under the GPL license, the development of the ioQuake3 engine became a possibility. This engine has undergone many improvements which has allowed games like UrT and Tremulous to be standalone and entirely free (not relying on a copy of Q3A to run).
My understanding of the GPL license is that the dev team could change back to restricted serial system and charge for it. The drawbacks are:
- Since the serial system would be a part of ioUrbanTerror (ioQuake3 with modifications), it would have to be open-source code per the rules of the ioQuake3 (Q3A source code) GPL. Obviously, hackers could see how the system works and most likely compromise it.
- Negative publicity.
- A severe decline in players from which it be difficult to recover.
- Having to develop and maintain such a system, which I wonder if the dev team has the resources to support.
- As part of developing this system, the dev team would have to break from the development track of ioQuake3, which is a serious problem if one wants to use future ioQuake3 updates.
The hackers and asshats are a nuisance yet I fear a restricted system would hasten the demise of UrT. Although I was gone for the 3.7 days, my impression is that the UrT was in a serious decline and might not have survived without the release of 4.0 under ioQuake3. UrT is a great game but it is running on a heavily modified engine that was released 10 years ago.
I fear that 4.2 will be the last major update. Regardless, I applaud the dev team for their continual development and support, and I will enjoy the game while it lasts.
Print this page