spammer?
mondjetoe, Mon May 11 2009, 07:55AMwooow i got my onw tag! like trancer, only he was a lil shitbag
that way waaay cool of you all! but im not the king of spam, pit is! you know pit from SSBB? pit is the mothefucking king of spam! hell spam this shit so hard youll shit yourself laughing
but dont dont concider myself a spammer, i talk smack good though
thanks guys,
later yall
Re: spammer?
mondjetoe, Wed Jun 10 2009, 07:52AM
jooow frakkers, how are things
still not guessed who i am
like the zombies from resi 4 would say -- moundecediiiii ! ----
mondjetoe, Wed Jun 10 2009, 07:52AM
jooow frakkers, how are things
still not guessed who i am
like the zombies from resi 4 would say -- moundecediiiii ! ----
Re: spammer?
Tranc3r, Wed Jun 10 2009, 09:24AM
Que?
Tranc3r, Wed Jun 10 2009, 09:24AM
Que?
Re: spammer?
|$|Son, Wed Jun 10 2009, 01:43PM
hes really messed up from his head :P
|$|Son, Wed Jun 10 2009, 01:43PM
hes really messed up from his head :P
Re: spammer?
FSK405 Earl, Thu Jun 11 2009, 10:58AM
Damnton?
FSK405 Earl, Thu Jun 11 2009, 10:58AM
mondjetoe
jooow frakkers, how are things
still not guessed who i am
like the zombies from resi 4 would say -- moundecediiiii ! ----
Damnton?
Re: spammer?
Littlefoot, Fri Jun 12 2009, 10:04AM
As a citizen of this country, which I believe in and which I have seen Mondjetoe tear apart, I must stand by our principles and be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost. Here's a quick review: I used to allege that Mondjetoe was a feckless proponent of separatism. However, after seeing how he wants to call evil good and good evil, I now have an even lower opinion of him. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that for all Mondjetoe's bombast about freedom, liberty, and tolerance, he still wants to take us over the edge of the abyss of vandalism. Of that I am certain because he ought to unstop his ears and uncover his eyes. Only then will Mondjetoe hear that to which he has been too long heedless. Only then will he see that his accomplices all look like him, think like him, act like him, and show a clear lack of respect not just for those brave souls who fought and died for what they believed in but also for you, the readers of this letter, just like Mondjetoe does. And all this in the name of—let me see if I can get their propaganda straight—brotherhood and service. Ha!
Mondjetoe's attempts to canonize salacious intemperate-types as nomological emblems of propriety are much worse than mere fogyism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. I shall not argue that Mondjetoe's newsgroup postings are an authentic map of his plan to fund a vast web of disorderly flakes, wretched, morally repugnant losers, and the worst classes of naive swindlers there are. Read them and see for yourself. Others may disagree but I feel that I don't see how Mondjetoe can build a workable policy around wishful thinking draped over a morass of confusion (and also, as we'll see below, historical illiteracy), then impose it willy-nilly on a population by force. I'm not saying that it can't possibly be done but rather that if you're like most people you just shrug your shoulders whenever you hear about Mondjetoe's latest publications. When your shoulders get tired of shrugging I hope you'll realize that I despise everything about Mondjetoe. I despise Mondjetoe's attempts to substitute breast-beating and schwarmerei for action and honest debate. I despise how he insists that the rigors that his victims have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement. Most of all, I despise his complete obliviousness to the fact that he doesn't want to acknowledge that his bootlickers are more determined than most diabolic bloodsuckers. In fact, Mondjetoe would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because he proclaims at every opportunity that he'd never blend together resistentialism and metagrobolism in a train wreck of monumental proportions. The gentleman doth protest too much, methinks.
It is well known that Mondjetoe's principles are incompatible with the proclivities of instrumental reason. But if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less corrupt than Mondjetoe. Those who are the most sensitive about this are not the average immoral, soulless manipulators of the public mind, but a minority of twisted jokers. That being the case, we can infer that we must call your attention to the problem of hopeless survivalists. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to put an end to adversarial solipsism. That's all for this letter. For those that don't like my views, get over it. I contend that I have as much a right to my views, and to express them, as anyone else. So when I say that this makes the issue an even greater tragedy, you can agree with me or not. That's all there is to it.
Littlefoot, Fri Jun 12 2009, 10:04AM
As a citizen of this country, which I believe in and which I have seen Mondjetoe tear apart, I must stand by our principles and be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost. Here's a quick review: I used to allege that Mondjetoe was a feckless proponent of separatism. However, after seeing how he wants to call evil good and good evil, I now have an even lower opinion of him. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that for all Mondjetoe's bombast about freedom, liberty, and tolerance, he still wants to take us over the edge of the abyss of vandalism. Of that I am certain because he ought to unstop his ears and uncover his eyes. Only then will Mondjetoe hear that to which he has been too long heedless. Only then will he see that his accomplices all look like him, think like him, act like him, and show a clear lack of respect not just for those brave souls who fought and died for what they believed in but also for you, the readers of this letter, just like Mondjetoe does. And all this in the name of—let me see if I can get their propaganda straight—brotherhood and service. Ha!
Mondjetoe's attempts to canonize salacious intemperate-types as nomological emblems of propriety are much worse than mere fogyism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. I shall not argue that Mondjetoe's newsgroup postings are an authentic map of his plan to fund a vast web of disorderly flakes, wretched, morally repugnant losers, and the worst classes of naive swindlers there are. Read them and see for yourself. Others may disagree but I feel that I don't see how Mondjetoe can build a workable policy around wishful thinking draped over a morass of confusion (and also, as we'll see below, historical illiteracy), then impose it willy-nilly on a population by force. I'm not saying that it can't possibly be done but rather that if you're like most people you just shrug your shoulders whenever you hear about Mondjetoe's latest publications. When your shoulders get tired of shrugging I hope you'll realize that I despise everything about Mondjetoe. I despise Mondjetoe's attempts to substitute breast-beating and schwarmerei for action and honest debate. I despise how he insists that the rigors that his victims have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement. Most of all, I despise his complete obliviousness to the fact that he doesn't want to acknowledge that his bootlickers are more determined than most diabolic bloodsuckers. In fact, Mondjetoe would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because he proclaims at every opportunity that he'd never blend together resistentialism and metagrobolism in a train wreck of monumental proportions. The gentleman doth protest too much, methinks.
It is well known that Mondjetoe's principles are incompatible with the proclivities of instrumental reason. But if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less corrupt than Mondjetoe. Those who are the most sensitive about this are not the average immoral, soulless manipulators of the public mind, but a minority of twisted jokers. That being the case, we can infer that we must call your attention to the problem of hopeless survivalists. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to put an end to adversarial solipsism. That's all for this letter. For those that don't like my views, get over it. I contend that I have as much a right to my views, and to express them, as anyone else. So when I say that this makes the issue an even greater tragedy, you can agree with me or not. That's all there is to it.
Re: spammer?
el kabong, Fri Jun 12 2009, 12:55PM
Someone... anyone... please wrestle that thesarus from LittleFoot's sweaty digits before he posts again.
el kabong, Fri Jun 12 2009, 12:55PM
Someone... anyone... please wrestle that thesarus from LittleFoot's sweaty digits before he posts again.
Re: spammer?
Littlefoot, Fri Jun 12 2009, 01:05PM
Too late!!! I've been spamming the forums all morning long...nothing can stop me now!!!!! Muahahahahahaha!
BTW, what's a thesaurus?
Littlefoot, Fri Jun 12 2009, 01:05PM
el kabong
Someone... anyone... please wrestle that thesarus from LittleFoot's sweaty digits before he posts again.
Too late!!! I've been spamming the forums all morning long...nothing can stop me now!!!!! Muahahahahahaha!
BTW, what's a thesaurus?
Re: spammer?
Boogie Knight, Fri Jun 12 2009, 06:08PM
English, MoFo, do you speak it?
Boogie Knight, Fri Jun 12 2009, 06:08PM
English, MoFo, do you speak it?
Re: spammer?
BatMann, Sun Jun 14 2009, 07:59PM
ROFL
BatMann, Sun Jun 14 2009, 07:59PM
ROFL
Print this page