Fokker
Vaughan, Tue Jan 20 2009, 03:11AMContact me at alpha_wolf ( *at* ) urtalphaclan ( *dot* ) com. LongbeachBean and I had a discussion tonight about what we are going to do about our Canadian friend who thinks its funny to cause problems on other people's servers. It's going to be helpful to have all the servers who were hit to take part in this.
Re: Fokker
LadyHellfire*, Tue Jan 20 2009, 11:59AM
Ummm... not to stir things, I am being genuinely curious..
Since you have chosen to "publicize" this rather than simply PM Frog, Dank, Earl (among others who would seem obvious choices).. Are you saying that Fokker has done something? If so, what please? Proof?
Almost any day around 4-5pm (PST) will have a good collection of FSK people on TS2, including Frog and Dank (many times). You should know that any FSK people you may deem capable of obtaining results (if even necessary) will be on TS2 at some point.
Sorry if I seem bitchy; I simply do not see why Fokker would go out of his way to do anything.. "wrong." "..servers who were hit.." could be construed as a pretty harsh preface to an accusation, or accusations, that would be therefor assumed to be quite serious. Once again, that alone, without full explanation, proof, and acknowledgment, would be best kept to PM, email, and even better- TS2 with the appropriate FSK members, and then if warranted, all affected (the "servers").
LadyHellfire*, Tue Jan 20 2009, 11:59AM
Ummm... not to stir things, I am being genuinely curious..
Since you have chosen to "publicize" this rather than simply PM Frog, Dank, Earl (among others who would seem obvious choices).. Are you saying that Fokker has done something? If so, what please? Proof?
Almost any day around 4-5pm (PST) will have a good collection of FSK people on TS2, including Frog and Dank (many times). You should know that any FSK people you may deem capable of obtaining results (if even necessary) will be on TS2 at some point.
Sorry if I seem bitchy; I simply do not see why Fokker would go out of his way to do anything.. "wrong." "..servers who were hit.." could be construed as a pretty harsh preface to an accusation, or accusations, that would be therefor assumed to be quite serious. Once again, that alone, without full explanation, proof, and acknowledgment, would be best kept to PM, email, and even better- TS2 with the appropriate FSK members, and then if warranted, all affected (the "servers").
Re: Fokker
gHOstFaCe, Tue Jan 20 2009, 12:49PM
No B-Ver. He wants to make sure that everyone running a server is involved or aware of the situation and help take action against the people who attacked damn near all of the popular UrT servers the other night using a Callvote exploit in the game. Fokker was probably the first name that came to mind when he was posting.
The IP's seem to match up to one UrT's regular trouble makers.
gHOstFaCe, Tue Jan 20 2009, 12:49PM
No B-Ver. He wants to make sure that everyone running a server is involved or aware of the situation and help take action against the people who attacked damn near all of the popular UrT servers the other night using a Callvote exploit in the game. Fokker was probably the first name that came to mind when he was posting.
The IP's seem to match up to one UrT's regular trouble makers.
Re: Fokker
Vaughan, Tue Jan 20 2009, 12:52PM
Errr, I think you misunderstood my intentions here. We're not going to be doing anything illegal or even personal. We're simply going to take some long overdue action within the framework of legality. As for "obvious choices" I have been gone for so long from FSK405 community that I had no idea who was still in charge or not. I'm not trying to argue with you B-Ver, I just think you misconstrued my intentions.
The reason I thought of Fokker was because on the early morning after this happened, we chatted in the |ALPHA| teamspeak and as I have been gone for so long from here that I don't really know who is who anymore, he seemed like an obvious contact choice.
Vaughan, Tue Jan 20 2009, 12:52PM
Errr, I think you misunderstood my intentions here. We're not going to be doing anything illegal or even personal. We're simply going to take some long overdue action within the framework of legality. As for "obvious choices" I have been gone for so long from FSK405 community that I had no idea who was still in charge or not. I'm not trying to argue with you B-Ver, I just think you misconstrued my intentions.
The reason I thought of Fokker was because on the early morning after this happened, we chatted in the |ALPHA| teamspeak and as I have been gone for so long from here that I don't really know who is who anymore, he seemed like an obvious contact choice.
Re: Fokker
LadyHellfire*, Tue Jan 20 2009, 02:05PM
LMAO!!!
OK, the way it was presented, it seemed like you were saying Fokker did something "bad" across several servers... not asking Fokker to contact you via email to be part of a resolution to an ongoing problem. Due to the lack of something like, "Fokker (or whomever can help), please email..."
The ".. to do about our Canadian friend.." is what completely sealed me thinking you were speaking ABOUT Fokker, rather than TO Fokker.
Egg feels good on my face.. lmao.. (GF- say anything about that comment, and I will smack you :D ).
LadyHellfire*, Tue Jan 20 2009, 02:05PM
LMAO!!!
OK, the way it was presented, it seemed like you were saying Fokker did something "bad" across several servers... not asking Fokker to contact you via email to be part of a resolution to an ongoing problem. Due to the lack of something like, "Fokker (or whomever can help), please email..."
The ".. to do about our Canadian friend.." is what completely sealed me thinking you were speaking ABOUT Fokker, rather than TO Fokker.
Egg feels good on my face.. lmao.. (GF- say anything about that comment, and I will smack you :D ).
Re: Fokker
Vaughan, Tue Jan 20 2009, 02:12PM
Can I say something about that comment? ;)
Vaughan, Tue Jan 20 2009, 02:12PM
Can I say something about that comment? ;)
Re: Fokker
FSK405 SupaflyT, Tue Jan 20 2009, 04:34PM
I was in the same vote as B-Ver. I thought this was like a demand that we turn over Fokker. I was waiting to see what you guys were offering in return. Probably wouldn't take too much. He's really only worth about .10 lives anyway (.05 Canadian).
FSK405 SupaflyT, Tue Jan 20 2009, 04:34PM
I was in the same vote as B-Ver. I thought this was like a demand that we turn over Fokker. I was waiting to see what you guys were offering in return. Probably wouldn't take too much. He's really only worth about .10 lives anyway (.05 Canadian).
Re: Fokker
Fear, Tue Jan 20 2009, 06:29PM
Dam. I was so glad that someone was calling out Fokker's "hacks" but it turns out you just need his canadian help...
Have you guys contacted UAA about these problems? Its nice to see clans working with others to make our community that much better. This is why I have always loved URT since day one.
B-ver.. you a lawyer?
Fear, Tue Jan 20 2009, 06:29PM
Dam. I was so glad that someone was calling out Fokker's "hacks" but it turns out you just need his canadian help...
Have you guys contacted UAA about these problems? Its nice to see clans working with others to make our community that much better. This is why I have always loved URT since day one.
B-ver.. you a lawyer?
Re: Fokker
Fokker, Tue Jan 20 2009, 08:09PM
....me fears the villagers with pitchforks and torches !!!!
Fokker, Tue Jan 20 2009, 08:09PM
....me fears the villagers with pitchforks and torches !!!!
Re: Fokker
gHOstFaCe, Wed Jan 21 2009, 11:00AM
Aww maaan! It was soooo perfect....
gHOstFaCe, Wed Jan 21 2009, 11:00AM
B-Ver
GF- say anything about that comment, and I will smack you :D.
Aww maaan! It was soooo perfect....
Re: Fokker
LadyHellfire*, Wed Jan 21 2009, 11:51AM
LadyHellfire*, Wed Jan 21 2009, 11:51AM
(evil grin) And you DON'T want me to smack you?
B-Ver
GF- say anything about that comment, and I will smack you :D.
Aww maaan! It was soooo perfect....
gHOstFaCe
Re: Fokker
useless, Wed Jan 21 2009, 04:55PM
he only says please don't SHOOT ghostface, so yea please smack him!! :)
useless, Wed Jan 21 2009, 04:55PM
he only says please don't SHOOT ghostface, so yea please smack him!! :)
Re: Fokker
DankRider, Wed Jan 21 2009, 05:17PM
I vote Fokker throws a flaming bag of shit on his doors step. - would that be legal.
ps. thanks for involving us, we will support any legal actions.
DankRider, Wed Jan 21 2009, 05:17PM
I vote Fokker throws a flaming bag of shit on his doors step. - would that be legal.
ps. thanks for involving us, we will support any legal actions.
Re: Fokker
gHOstFaCe, Thu Jan 22 2009, 08:39AM
Depends on which flipper you use. It could be HAWT!
gHOstFaCe, Thu Jan 22 2009, 08:39AM
(evil grin) And you DON'T want me to smack you?
B-Ver
GF- say anything about that comment, and I will smack you :D.
Aww maaan! It was soooo perfect....
gHOstFaCe
B-Ver
Depends on which flipper you use. It could be HAWT!
Print this page